Author: Mick Hartley

  • Referred to by gender neutral “they/them” pronouns

    Here we go again. Jennifer Sieland at Reduxx:

    A man who identifies as a woman has been sentenced to 16 years in prison after being found guilty of sexually assaulting multiple young boys. In their statement on the sentence, Lancashire Police declined to use pronouns for Joanne Evans, while local media referred to him as “they/them.”

    Evans, 40, was first arrested in 2020 after police became aware that he had been sexually preying on young boys in Swansea. The youngest victim was just 8 years old at the time he was sexually assaulted, and two additional victims who came forward were both under the age of 13.

    Evans was charged with assault by penetration of a child and sexual assault by touching of a child, but was not remanded to custody. Earlier this month, he was expected in Burnley Crown Court but refused to appear, resulting in a jury finding him guilty in his absence.

    On May 17, Evans was sentenced to a total of 17 years, with 16 years in prison and 1 year on community license….

    In the statement, Lancashire Police did not use pronouns for Evans, but noted that he “uses different male and female names and identities.” The statement did not include what other names or identities Evans utilized.

    In media coverage of the sentence, most outlets referred to Evans by gender neutral “they/them” pronouns.

    Hmm – non-binary, then.

  • Not selling TERF books

    Back north of the border, with Literature Alliance Scotland (LAS) – which is, as Magi Gibson notes, “one of Scotland’s leading and most powerful publicly-funded literary organisations”. Under Resources on their website they have a document (pdf) on Supporting Trans Writers.

    For bookshops:

    • don’t sell TERF books/platform TERF authors.
    • Don’t expect trans booksellers to sell them. Trans people who see TERF books or ‘gender criticism’ in a bookshop will understand that the bookshop doesn’t want them there.

    Just like when you go into a bookshop and see a book on Marxism, you know the bookshop doesn’t want anyone there who holds opposing views on Karl and the gang. It can be very traumatising.

    On the other hand, you know…that’s not how bookshops work. A leading literary organisation might be expected to know that – and not be encouraging censorship.

    Update: now removed.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • An institutional problem

    l”.

    The BBC has refused to refer to the rape, kidnapping and slaughter of civilians on October 7 as terrorism, but a presenter insisted that “Israeli forces are happy to kill children” in an interview with Naftali Bennett. It claimed Israel was “targeting medical teams and Arab speakers” at Gaza’s largest hospital and reported unverified allegations by Hamas that the Israeli army was carrying out “summary executions” of Palestinians in Gaza six times. We had to wait more than a fortnight before they finally admitted it had not been true….

    The reporting of the explosions at the Al-Ahli hospital in October – for which the BBC apologised – was even worse. BBC correspondent Jon Donnison said: “It’s hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion, other than an Israeli airstrike or several airstrikes.” Bowen piled in, claiming the hospital “was flattened”. He said: “The missile hit the hospital not long after dark … The explosion destroyed Al-Ahli hospital.”

    Reports of the incident had a very serious impact. Joe Biden’s visit to the Middle East was disrupted, with the cancellation of a summit in Jordan with Arab leaders and the President of the Palestinian Authority. Protests took place in more than a dozen countries. Synagogues were attacked in Tunisia and Berlin.

    Independent investigations showed the cause was actually a rocket fired by Palestinian Islamic Jihad at Israel that had landed in the hospital’s car park. The hospital had not been “flattened” or “destroyed”. Bowen admitted his reports had been wrong but said, “I don’t regret a thing and I don’t feel bad at all.”

    Gary Lineker is the face of BBC football but retweeted a post calling for the country’s team to be banned from international competition. He said a video by Corbyn-supporting hard-left campaigner Owen Jones in which the academic Raz Segal accused Israel of “genocide” was “worth 13 minutes of anyone’s time”.

    Last week he referred to the October 7 atrocities as “the Hamas thing” but described Israel’s campaign to deal with the terrorists and free the hostages as “the worst thing I’ve seen in my lifetime”.

    The BBC guidelines are clear: “Everyone who works for the BBC,” they say, “should ensure their activity on social media platforms does not compromise the perception of or undermine the impartiality and reputation of the BBC.”

    The failure to uphold the guidelines when it comes to Lineker makes the board and senior managers look weak and foolish.

    We would all accept that a huge broadcaster will occasionally get things wrong, but the scale and frequency of mistakes now looks like an institutional problem.

  • “We wanted to show that Israeli art, pride and spirit cannot be stopped”

    “>“Those people don’t know what it’s like to live in the middle of Israel, to try to live with the conflict, to have to run with your kids to the shelter.The first thing my son asked when we moved to London two years ago was: ‘Mum, where can we find the shelter?’”…

    Pro-Israel supporters, some of whom admitted to having felt apprehensive about attending the rally, said they left feeling jubilant. One lady said: “I feel an immense sense of connection and pride. I can’t believe the feeling of unity. I’ve been to a few protests, but this one tops them all.”

    Another told the JC: “I never imagined I would be dancing to Moshiah in the middle of East Finchley High Road, waving an Israeli flag. It’s unprecedented.”

    One of the organisers, Orit Eyal-Fibeesh, said afterwards: “We wanted to show that Israeli art, pride and spirit cannot be stopped.”

    “We think that the world needs to know and needs to see [what happened on October 7]. They can’t hide any longer behind the atrocities they’ve committed. For the few of the hostages that are still live, we owe it to them to continue to fight and continue to show that Israel is not the evil in all of this.”

    Asked how many people she had expected to come to support the film screening, Eyal-Fibeesh said: “We realised that people were eager to show up, but we didn’t realise how many people would come. There are people from across the community – left-wing right-wing, religious, non-religious. There is a wide consensus that Israel is alive and Israel is here to stay.

    “We have our place – even in this country. We don’t want to hide. We will never hide. We will hold our heads high.”

  • Talking to clever idiots

    "What makes males a greater risk?" Gosh. Kathleen Stock puts up with it in America:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • The goal of the oppressed is liberation, but the goal of fundamentalists is domination

    ith jihadist ideologies of global domination/proliferation of political Islam and bankrolled by billionaires—took 19 year old girls captive as sex slaves? Never.

    Why? Because the goal of the oppressed is liberation, but the goal of fundamentalists is domination.

    Why are these exclusively women that they’re proudly parading around as captives for the world to see? Why do they want everybody to know what they did? Because sexual violence is a war tactic intentionally committed to subjugate, humiliate, embarrass, instill fear in, and dominate a population. It is psychological warfare.

    That is not the language of the oppressed. That is the language of the oppressor.

    If, as a society, we cannot draw the line at sexual violence against young girls committed for the purpose of psychological warfare, then as a society we have no lines at all, no values, no morals, and are vulnerable to corruption and collapse.

    The line of moral clarity is so clear here, I am begging you to climb out of the fog of indoctrination and see it.

  • In East Finchley

    inema-targeted-by-anti-israel-protesters-chpv5j19″>JC:

    London’s oldest cinema has been targeted by anti-Israel protesters ahead of a private screening of a documentary on the October 7 massacre at the Supernova music festival.

    “Say no to artwashing” in large red lettering was found graffitied across the front of the much-loved Phoenix Cinema in East Finchley, north London, this morning. The iconic signage had also been splattered with red paint….

    Odelia Haroush, one of the founders and the CEO of the Seret Israeli film festival, which is hosting tonight’s screening of “Supernova”, told the JC: “What they have written is awful, and it’s so not true. On the contrary to artwashing, we are showing what really happened on October 7. We are showing a documentary film. The world should know about the horrors.

    Haroush added: “I’m totally against cancelling culture. If the other side has something to say, they can make a film and screen it.”…

    Campaign Against Antisemitism posted on Twitter: “Ahead of a screening of a documentary about Hamas’ barbaric attack on the Nova music festival on 7th October, in which over 360 people were killed, the @PhoenixCinema has been defaced.

    "The historic Cinema resides in Finchley, an area of London home to a large Jewish community. This vandalism must be investigated immediately as a matter of urgency, @MetPoliceUK”

    Sarah Sackman, Labour candidate for Finchley and Golders Green, wrote on X/Twitter: “I’m not going to dignify the criminals who did this damage by reposting the image of their disgusting action. This community cinema in a diverse neighbourhood is screening a documentary about the 7 October pogrom. The cinema should screen it.”

    A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said that the graffiti was being investigated “as a potential hate crime”, but that no arrests had been made.

    Protests and counter-protests are expected to take place outside the cinema before this evening’s screening. The Met spokeserson said that officers would be there “to make sure those attending can protest safely whilst at the same time minimising serious disruption to the community”.

    What possible justification can there be for violently protesting a documentary film like this? What antisemitic moral sewer do these people swim in? 

    A petition at Change.org. – Stop the Planned Protests in Finchley and Protect the Jewish Community.

    Update:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Inducing iatrogenic disease

    and frankly negligent approach’. She stated that ‘in Australia, the treatment provided by GenderGP would be unlawful’.”…

    She had “never before (in her 20 years in the field) seen such a ‘massive dose’ of testosterone administered to a young person,” said Judge McFarlane.

    […]

    “When a child enters the clinic of a paediatric gender endocrinologist for their first injection of a puberty blocker, they have zero endocrine disease. That child’s hormone levels are all exactly where they should be. Yet when they leave, the paediatric gender endocrinologist has induced abnormal hormone levels. When that child turns 16, that iatrogenic hormone suppression has continued. The paediatric gender endocrinologist then goes one step further, and deliberately introduces exogenous sex hormones. They deliberately raise a female’s testosterone to levels that can only be described as pathological. They are inducing iatrogenic disease. On purpose. Not as a side effect, but deliberately.”—Paediatrician Dr Dylan Wilson, Substack post, May 2022

    […]

    “In 2022, almost 500 females aged 14-18 started Australian government-funded testosterone as if they were being treated for the male malady of ‘androgen deficiency due to an established testicular disorder’.”—Gender Clinic News, November 2023

  • Campus antisemitism

    5yRYpzMAQ5vdCUCyICZmRmBVbP2qMG9QDvwVGmA_aem_AbKn8a8wD3ye-Xi8eXcjYnlnSKeRqjoUd3SVKv2DI-TycWY2-_3qb43pe5qZ-0h544cN-kZlv5zimqZg_GK927QW”>Victor Davis Hanson:

    Of course, after the October 7 IDF entry into Gaza, the demonstrations became far bolder and more numerous, but not really different in their aims and rhetoric. More often, Jewish students were chased and assaulted. Few if any protestors asked whether supposedly identifiable Jewish students were pro- or anti-Israel, but simply harassed any who seemed Jewish.

    Why did the patently illegal occupation of campus property spread? Why the escalation to medieval anti-Semitic threats to Jews and various takes on the “Final Solution?”

    One, throngs of poorly educated American students—many of them part of the diversity/equity/identity movement—saw Gaza as fuel for their Marxist-themed binary of oppressed versus oppressors. So they eagerly plugged Israel into the tired role of a white, interloping, neo-colonialist, and “settler” state—on the correct assumption that they had grown up with the assurance that smearing whites in racist fashion was not only tolerated but encouraged as a blow against white “privilege,” “supremacy,” or “rage.”

    These settler and colonialist smears were ahistorical. Jewish “settler” culture and civilization date before 1200 B.C.—some 1800 years prior to the Arab invasions that displaced Byzantine control of the Middle East. But then again, remember, we are dealing with the supposed moral and intellectual elite of America who have no idea what “Palestine” means or where it came from and certainly could not identify Gaza on a map. They often charge America with genocide, but otherwise they were not too bothered by the medieval-style beheadings, rape, and mutilations of October 7.

    The students also know little of the “Final Solution” or what their prompters meant by “Go Back to Poland” (again, the ovens of Auschwitz). Instead, clueless, indulged students provide the American-citizen fodder for the protests. They know how campus unrest unfolds and the predictable Munich-like responses of campus administrators and blue-city mayors and governors.

    At 11 million, Israel’s population is vastly outnumbered by some 500 million Arab and Muslim neighbors, many of whom are existentially hostile. So the idea of an imperial overdog or colonialist oppressor Israel is absurd. Most of the hatred in the Arab world and its expatriates on Western campuses toward Israel is driven by envy and frustration that Israel is a humane, free, prosperous, and lawful constitutional state in a way most Arab nations are still not. Add that the Arab world has prompted five or six serial wars against Israel, lost them all, and on spec resorted to terrorism to gain what their militaries could not—and yet Israel still prospers while its neighbors do not since that would mean to dismantle autocracy, tribalism, gender apartheid, religious intolerance, anti-Semitism, and inert socialist economies….

  • The ANC and Iran

    This sounds all too plausible. From the JC:

    South Africa brought the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in return for bribes from Iran, a group of 160 lawyers has alleged.

    In a letter to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the lawyers say that the ruling African National Congress (ANC) experienced a sudden financial turnaround after it launched the ICJ case, a fact that warrants an inquiry under America’s anti-corruption Magnitsky Act.

    Organised by the Israel Law Centre, Shurat HaDin, the letter – signed by legal experts from the US, Israel, Australia, Canada, England, Hong Kong, Brazil, France, Singapore and Netherlands – also draws attention to a series of meetings between ANC leaders and Iranian officials.

    Days after October 7, the ANC’s foreign minister Naledi Pandor flew to Tehran to meet her Iranian counterpart Hossein Amir-Abdollahian.

    The pair discussed what Pandor referred to as Israel’s “apartheid”.

    ANC politicians also met Hamas when they visited South Africa in December.

    Hamas’s former government minister Basem Naim and its representative in Iran, Khaled Qaddoumi, were part of the delegation.

    The visit underscored the “cosy” relationship between South Africa and Hamas, one Israeli official said at the time. Weeks after Hamas’s visit, South Africa filed against Israel at the ICJ.

    The letter suggests that the rapid improvements in the ANC’s sudden financial position can be linked to these meetings and the ICJ case.

    The ANC has had crippling financial difficulties, but after it tabled the genocide case at the Hague, the party announced that its finances had stabilised.