e engaged in a war. Several Hamas terrorists are killed and wounded. The bodies of these terrorists are taken to hospital.
Scene 2: Cut to local hospital. Images of dead – mostly men of fighting age are seen. Random people speak to camera about how they were shot at by tanks for just wanting food. Doctors are used to confirm the terrorists were civilians killed near an aid site.
Scene 3: Western media sources – now overrun by ex Al-Jazeera staffers & other Islamists who hate Jews – spring into action. Stories begin to circulate about the latest 'massacre'. The 'journos' know what they are going to write – but reach out to the IDF for a 'right to reply'.
Scene 4: The IDF receive questions from media. They know there was no massacre and know the incident took place not at the aid station, but some distance away. The IDF respond acknowledging their forces were under threat and they fired warning shots.
Scene 5: The activist journo has his story. Hamas (who they believe) say 'massacre'. There are bodies at hospital. The IDF (who they don't believe) say they just fired warning shots.
'Massacre at aid site' headline is built in places like @bbcnews @skynews .
Off camera. No editor questions why with 60 million cameras in Gaza, there is never clear footage of these events. Nobody asks the doctor in hospital how he knows what happened at the aid site if he wasn't even there. The goal is clear. Another chance to demonise Israel.
Final scene: 'Massacre' headline runs at media outlets that have turned into pro-Hamas mouthpieces. Curtain falls.
Journos stand to applause from audience of antisemites & Islamists.
'Come back tomorrow' the Gazans shout, we are running the show again. The journos wink back.
Off camera…
Hamas terrorists congratulate themselves over another successful production.
One asks – how can western media be so stupid? They put into headlines whatever nonsense we give them..
Another replies. It is easy… we have lots of friends there now. END.
Leave a Reply