“Call me naive…”

Written by

in

t never happened; that the rate was just 1%. Well, I certainly hadn’t done a hundred hysterectomies for gender affirmation. So what was going on here?

And so on. It's a tough read, but I suppose it's a welcome sign of the times that someone so clearly unsuited to a rebel role – someone who has always happily followed the party line and is dedicated to her career and to her patients – is now beginning to see the light. Things have got so bad in "gender-affirming care" in the US that even someone like Karla Solheim here feels compelled to speak out.

I had just assumed the experts crafting guidelines were ensuring that there was a body of evidence supporting the incontrovertible long-term benefits for these extraordinary treatments that were being performed on young people: puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and double mastectomy.

But you assumed wrong. 

Comments

  1. Gene Avatar
    Gene

    So apparently surgeons lack the ability to do their own reviews of research literature on medical topics, even when they sense something isn’t right. How encouraging.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *