Safeguarding repurposed as a species of prejudice

Written by

in

style=”font-size: 11pt”>What’s astonishing about this is how quickly it’s happened. In a few short years, safeguarding has been repurposed as a species of prejudice, based not in genuine concern but prejudice against LGBT people. The word “trans” is akin to fairy dust, sprinkled in the eyes of credulous people — and the effects are already becoming apparent.

The rights of children to be protected from sexual predators has been trumped by the new trans cult. Janice Turner, back in August:

The oldest and gravest homophobic slur, the justification for Section 28, was that gay men can’t be trusted around children. This myth was rightly demolished, yet since then a collective guilt has tipped the scales the other way. Anyone who raises safeguarding concerns about LGBT groups or individuals risks being called a bigot.

Ever since the T was added to the LGB.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *