A Revolting Decision

Written by

in

Dutch news from Expatica:

Immigration minister Rita Verdonk says gay asylum seekers from Iran should be sent back home. Six months ago she had refused to send them back because two gay Iranian men had been executed there.

Verdonk said in a letter to the Second Chamber that there was no question of anyone being executed or sentenced to death purely on the basis of their being gay, although she did concede that gay sex was punishable by death by Iranian interpretation of Islamic law.

Even so, gay asylum seekers should be returned, she said, based on information from the Foreign Office about the actual situation in Iran. The two gay men were executed not for their sexuality but because they had robbed, kidnapped and raped a minor.

The gay rights organization COC described Verdonk’s decision as “revolting” and based on incorrect information about the Iranian regime.

Verdonk says that asylum-seeking Iranian Christians who have converted from Islam, who also face strong societal disapproval, can also safely be sent back.

Comments

  1. Juan Golblado Avatar
    Juan Golblado

    What the fuck is wrong with that woman!?

  2. P. Froward Avatar

    “Strong societal disapproval”? Is that what they’re calling it nowadays?
    Whether or not immigration from Iran in general is a problem, it seems very damned unlikely that gay or apostate asylum-seekers are going to hook up with Abu Hamza (ba-dum, chshsh!) and start blowing things up. I mean, for heaven’s sake, what is she thinking?

  3. Stephen Reeves Avatar

    Of course if an extremist Imam was involved, he would be allowed to stay.

  4. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    An example of the old Jewish aphorism: “He who is compassionate to the cruel will ultimately become cruel to the compassionate”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *