Natural Rights

Written by

in

A strange line on the evolution controversy, from a self-confessed agnostic:

In principle, this appears to be a harmless intellectual debate, where science and theology weave and blur. But, in fact, the controversy affects the very roots of Western civilization and, in the long run, can have tremendous consequences on a political level.

The whole philosophical and juridical structure that supports liberal democracy hinges on the existence of a superior being from whom emanate the ”natural rights” that protect individuals from the actions of the state or from the will of other people. If the premise of God’s existence disappears, the theory of the existence of natural rights is automatically eliminated and the door is flung open to all kinds of abuses.

I believe it was Immanuel Kant who first formulated the decisive refutation of this position, with his famous quip, nein, das ist scheisse.

Comments

  1. P. Froward Avatar

    Okay, if it’s scheisse (or “poo”, as modern thinkers prefer to call it), where then do rights come from? How do we know we have them? How do we know what they are? How do we know they won’t change next week?
    People who care about philosophy must, I imagine, have answers to these questions, but are they answers that the average ice-hockey goalie or United States senator can grasp and take seriously, or is it one of those things that makes sense to nobody but a philosopher, and the rest of us are expected to take it on faith?
    Everybody, all together now, in G:
    UNHCHR loves me, this I know,
    ’cause Polly Toynbee told me so…

  2. D. Vader Avatar

    Furthermore, I find your lack of faith… disturbing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *