Defending Intelligent Design

Written by

in

c research to all aspects of society. Finally is the control that scientists continue to exert over how their history is told. Past diversions and failures remain largely hidden, resulting in an airbrushed picture of ‘progress’ otherwise absent from human affairs.

The pursuit of knowledge? The fact that it works? Nah. Don’t feature.

He then passes quickly over the actual details of the case:

an obscure American physicist, Alan Sokal, published an article designed [to] expose what he regarded as the absurdities advanced by our field…

and suggests that scientists have wilfully misunderstood what science studies is all about:

When science studies says…Science is socially constructed.

Scientists read…Science is whatever enough people think it is.

Well, certainly science is socially constructed, but that isn’t all it is, for God’s sake. It’s hard to credit that someone who’s read Popper can so completely miss the point. It’s as though someone carried out a study of fishing, noting the way that different methods were adopted by different classes – coarse fishing for the proles, fly fishing for the toffs – and proposed that fishing was all about confirming social status and maintaining the power of the privileged elite, without ever having grasped that the main point of fishing is to catch fish.

Affirmative action for fringe ideas – as though it’s all about power. As though the only difference between a successful experiment and a failed experiment is that the successful experimenters shout louder, or have richer backers, or have established a hegemonic discourse. Hey, whatever, let’s give astrology a chance, or homeopathy, or Kirlian bioenergetics…..or Intelligent Design.

I imagine he’s confusing science with cultural studies, where you can indeed get away with anything.

Update: see this account of Fuller’s testimony (via Butterflies and Wheels).

According to Dr. Fuller, belief in genetic mutation and natural selection has a tendency to make people just “sit around and wait to die” instead of questioning, studying and testing ideas. On the flip side, he said that cultures in which people believe they were “crafted in the image and likeness of God” have historically been more inquisitive and have developed a larger body of scientific knowledge than other cultures. He suggested that these people felt “like God” and therefore had the confidence to believe that they could figure out how life works.

Comments

  1. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    “your genuine cultural studies intellectual”
    Guffaw.

  2. DaninVan Avatar

    Lol..if the object of fishing is to actually catch fish, a lot of people have spent gobs of money on a fruitless quest.

  3. wilson Avatar

    How did Prof Fuller travel to the U.S.?
    He probably went by aeroplane and not by, the preferred mode of travel of scientific relativists, magic carpet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *