Not Vietnam

Written by

in

argued that Ho Chi Minh was training commandos to bring down skyscrapers in New York. Today, however, Americans know that this is precisely what our jihadist enemies have pledged to do.

Moreover, Vietnam offered a seeming middle way between immediate withdrawal on the one hand and staying the course on the other: negotiations, which in the end did take place. Today there is no one to negotiate with, no middle ground, not even an apparent plausible compromise. The only choices are to succeed in establishing a self-sufficient, democratic Iraq or to call an abject retreat that not only gives Iraq over to the tender mercies of people who specialize in blowing up innocents but also makes it a base of operations for worldwide jihad.

The very fact that Cindy Sheehan and her WWP comrades are so enthusiastic for the latter outcome tells you how difficult it will be to turn widespread discontent about the war into a mainstream antiwar movement.

Comments

  1. DA Avatar

    of gov’t, as our way of “establishing” one.
    Looked at a map of the region? Just like Vietnam was surrounded by nations opposed to democracy, so too is Iraq. Are we prepared to annihilate Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia? Or, shall we expend a decade or more, and another 60,000+/- young American lives to RE-teach ignorant politicians yet again, that there is no such thing as fighting a “war” to “establish”, or build, or even to simply defend. Because “war” is about destruction … complete and total destruction … annihilation.
    Rums-failed and company got it wrong. Sure, America can force a democracy in / on Iraq. The only “choice” we have to make is what price are we willing to pay to get it done. Obviously, millionaire politicians, who never have to fight themselves, or send THEIR children, are willing to committ bullets and bombs and young American lives to impossible tasks.
    In Iraq our enemies do not have to defeat us in order to win. But, if we are to truly win our goal, we must first annihilate all of them … and “them” includes Syrians, Iranians, Saudi’s, Pakies, etc, etc, etc. BushCo is not risking world war for a democracy in Iraq. BushCo is risking it for access to the last of the oil. To believe otherwise is to be as stupid as politicians would like you to be.
    Politicians sent us to Vietnam to be killed for nothing. They are doing it again, today, in Iraq. The parallels are many, and they are real, and they are true.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *