Just watched some of Dispatches on Supermarket Secrets – “what price are we paying for the homogenised, cheap and convenient food that supermarkets specialise in?” It didn’t say anything much we didn’t know, but its shots of battery chickens made me think…
In a sense, a chicken’s genetic code provides a recipe for producing chicken breasts, chicken thighs, etc., ie the stuff we want from chickens, and what makes us keep millions of the poor little buggers in sheds for all of their short miserable lives. We’re in the process of unravelling genetic codes and how they work. Is it reasonable to think that we might be able to produce these breasts and thighs directly, as it were? That is, without bothering with the actual chicken?
What’s missing of course – the other essential ingredient in the recipe – is the nurture: the actual growth and development of the chicken. So look at it another way: what if we could breed a chicken without any higher mental functions whatsoever, with just enough neural activity to get it to eat and sleep and keep itself healthy? Do away with any social stuff, all the sex, the ability to search for food, find a mate, bring up young ones: basically a completely brainless chicken just capable of breathing and eating. Wouldn’t even need feathers. So… if we get to that stage and farm these zombie chicks, is that a moral advance, because the chickens can’t really be said to suffer and we can roast our chickens with an easy conscience (and cheaply), or a moral outrage, because we’ve tampered with life and created monsters?
Leave a Reply