Sophisticated Analyses

Written by

in

Lileks on the London bombings:

Some believe that England was already America, inasmuch as both were ruled by fiendish quazi-nazis who tossed their nations into a war for grins and giggles. Some believe that the bombings in London, like the ones in Madrid, can be blamed on Bush and Blair for the Iraq campaign. It’s always interesting to see how people who pride themselves on sophisticated analyses and exquisitely tuned cultural sensibilities cannot see the plain home truths. The foe sneers: you are infidels; you die now. The moderns pull a face, steeple their fingers, and wonder what they really mean. Surely this is a result of invading Iraq and forcing them to have elections. Surely one of the bombers was an ordinary Iraqi who lived a peaceable life – well, aside from the time that Qusay’s men came by, took his daughter, returned her the next day as a broken heap who died from a vaginal hemorrage, and aside from the time when his brother was thrown off a roof because someone said he had turned his portrait of Saddam to the wall – surely it was the invasion that made this ordinary man take the understandable step of moving to London to kill commuters. […]

They did not bomb London because there is insufficient transparency in Congress about the Gitmo detainees; they bombed London because it is part of the Zionist-Crusader Conspiracy run by the sons of monkeys and pigs, who must submit or die.

Any questions?

Comments

  1. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    Unfortunately, from some e-mails I’ve received, the conspiracy~apologists brains have finally turned to compost. They would read your above piece and see only “…..they bombed London because it is part of the Zionist-Crusader Conspiracy run by the sons of monkeys and pigs, who must submit or die.”
    I despair for our collective future.

  2. Juan Golblado Avatar
    Juan Golblado

    Indeed. See how we’ve made them think!? They’re so angry at us they’re incoherent.
    I just ran across this response by a leftist academic to a pacifist. It renews my hope that even leftist academics can learn to see sense:
    http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=55

  3. juan_golblado Avatar

    All these leftists against overthrowing Saddam and against the war on terror are beginning to make me think of “leftist” in a very different way than when I considered myself one. I still consider myself one, but I also consider “the left” to be full of shit most of the time. So it’s very confusing.
    What I should have said about Tim Burke is I should have described him as an “anti-war academic” rather than “leftist academic”. It is his anti-war position that makes his comment in response to the pacifist interesting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *