More Scars

Written by

in

I finally caught up with Scars of Evolution part 2: well worth a listen if the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis interests you, and still available here. The programme concentrated on three arguments:

1) Brain size: the remarkable growth in our ancestors’ brain size strongly suggests a diet rich in the necessary nutrients, notably omega-3 fatty acids and iodine, which are available in abundance in a marine environment.

2) Breathing: for land mammals, including all other primates, breathing is like heart rate, something outside voluntary control. For fully aquatic mammals like dolphins and whales, breathing is entirely under conscious control (they sleep a half-brain at a time so they can keep coming up for air). For us, it’s mostly unconscious but can be controlled voluntarily: a necessary adaptation for a semi-aquatic life, and of course for speech.

3) The Vernix: we’re the only primates to be born covered in a waxy substance known as the Vernix caseosa. Useful for when you’re born in the water. It turns out seals may have something similar.

Well, I’m convinced, but Jim Moore has said he’ll be putting up a rebuttal on his anti-AAT website.

Comments

  1. Jim M Avatar
    Jim M

    The page on the BBC show is up (folks can get to it via the link you gave).
    And I wasn’t going to say anything more here but something in your entry demonstrates a good point to make about being careful of writings about science. You said of the vernix, “Useful for when you’re born in the water.” Is it? Why do you say it is? Is there any indication that it is? You see, the answer to these questions is that there is no indication that it is useful in water, and the radio show gave no reasons either — in fact, they said little about what use it seems to have (apparently it’s anti-bacterial and since it gets washed off, it would seem to be not particularly useful in water). But you got the impression that it was from the show, even though that impression doesn’t really follow from the show. What happened there was good storytelling. Both Morgan (an accomplished and award-winning screenwriter) and David Attenborough are terrific storytellers, but this skill can be used to give an impression where the facts don’t support it.
    The case of the vernix is just one example of this (Morgan’s work is full of similar examples) and is a cautionary example of how you have to be careful when you approach science stories, not just on radio or TV, but in magazines and newspapers, and online. Watch out for being ensanred by good storytelling to the deteriment of understanding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *