Suicide Bombers

Written by

in

After the Iran-Iraq war ended, the tactic was adopted in other wars — in particular, by Hezbollah, the Iranian-supported Shia fighters in southern Lebanon. The first and most spectacular demonstration came on October 23, 1983, when a yellow lorry approached the US Marine barracks in southern Beirut. Instead of stopping when challenged, the driver accelerated, smashed straight into the building and detonated a huge bomb that killed 241 American troops. Later, the only surviving American eye-witness said that the driver “looked right at me and smiled . . . As soon as I saw the truck over there I knew what was going to happen.”

The review, and to judge by it the book being reviewed, are strangely emotionless in their descriptions. We’re used to the most appalling cruelty being visited on enemies: that’s as old as history. And those in power sending the young to their death – as in the First World War – is sadly familiar. But children of 13 or so being sent to their deaths “with a plastic key for their entry into paradise” is surely about as low as it is possible to go.

In the Observer magazine, an article on one of the female Palestinian suicide bombers (“shahidas”), Wafa Idris, makes the point that these women are generally outcasts from their society in one form or another: in Idris’ case a divorcee and a “troubled young woman who was prone to bouts of melancholy and depression”.

Knowing this, the point that Reuter wishes to make, about the “compelling example” of the martyr, is rather vitiated. There’s nothing compelling or noble about sending children or vulnerable women to their death. Despicable is a more apt description.

Binyon closes his review:

Despite the worries of some Palestinian leaders at the global condemnation, Reuter sees no let-up by Islamist radicals; indeed, he scorns Bush’s claim that al-Qaeda is on the run. But he believes that no society can sustain suicide bombings in the long run. In the main non-Muslim conflict where the tactic has been copied, by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, the use of child bombers has fallen. And in Iran itself there is now total disillusion; the child martyrs are no longer celebrated, and families openly question the point of the sacrifice.

This leads Reuter to the book’s thought-provoking conclusion: suicide bombers cannot be defeated by Western military might or the threat of reprisals. That only confirms their zealotry. “Global manipulators of resentment and fear like bin Laden can be defeated only from within, by their own societies and cultures,” he says. As events in the troubled Muslim world show, that is likely to take a very long time.

This is not a thought-provoking conclusion: it’s so obvious that it’s barely worth stating. Of course the ultimate defeat of terrorism will only come when attitudes within those societies that nurture it have changed. But force can have a considerable effect on these attitudes, particularly the belief that suicide bombing works: an attitude that gained some credence with the perceived success of Hezbollah in driving the Israelis out of Southern Lebanon.

Another step towards the end of suicide bombing would be a clear condemnation of this practice from the Western societies these attacks are aimed at: in particular an end to the fatuous notion that these crimes are understandable, or in any way justified.

Comments

  1. Eve Garrard Avatar
    Eve Garrard

    Terrific post, Mick. It would be interesting to know why these crimes are thought to be so understandable and (for some) even excusable. Is it because of the youth of the perpetrators, or the sense that some people seem to have of their purity of motive – what they do isn’t selfish, at least not in the usual way, and that seems somehow to vindicate it? This could be part of a general romantic privileging of purity of motive over other moral considerations, such as the hellish consequences for innocent others.

  2. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    MEMRI has several examples of authority figures encouraging suicide bombers. The most horrifying example is an editorial written by a professor of psychiatry at an Egyptian University. At one point, he actually asks the reader to visualize the happiness of the bomber, and says something like this (quoting from memory): ” … 3, 2, 1, death and he enters paradise.” This is an educated man. He knows he is lying.

  3. lgude Avatar
    lgude

    he same time I completely agree that excusing it as understandable only encourages it – particularly when the great majority of those so excusing it are secular people who are viewing it through a theoretical lens such as anti-colonialism and have little feel for the medieval religeous roots of the phenomena. The tactics needed, it sems to me, are a balance between firmly opposing terrorism and patience. Because there is the possibility of suicidal fanatics using WNDs I believe we will have to remain vigilant for ‘a long time’ – at least another two generations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *