Blog

  • The “JK Rowling trans controversy”

    uot;cosy crime", but this was one of the worst. I've never liked all that Richard Curtis, Marigold Hotel stuff anyway – selling a gentrified hammy vision of Britain to America, it seems to me.

    Compare perhaps to the Marlow Murder Club. Nonsense, of course, but, in the first episode at least, quite clever: three killers swapping victims. Yes, it's been done before with Patricia Highsmith/Hitchcock Strangers on a Train, but it was well handled. And it didn't take itself too seriously. Low budget – and there weren't any megastars strutting their stuff. Pierce Brosnan and Ben Kingsley in The Thursday Murder Club, though – godawful. And the dim lower class policeman bamboozled by all the clever Oxford-educated, ex-MI5 toffs….

  • Radical trans ideology

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Man dancing

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Like Ricky Gervais in The Office.

  • “Due to the lack of alignment with our inclusive environment”

    t: 40px”>The phone call took place after the boy’s mother was asked to explain why she had replied to a question on her son’s application form asking her to state the eight-year-old’s pronouns, by saying: “Seriously?”

    In a statement, the charity claimed its decision was not based on the mother’s objection to the question about pronouns, but her “aggressive” conduct over the phone and the fact that a potential “conflict” might arise given there was going to be a transgender child at the camp.

    But internal papers documenting the incident state that the eight-year-old was barred after the summer camp concluded that the mother’s “views on gender and inclusivity” did not “align” with its own.

    A report on the incident read: “We will be making the family unsuccessful for this year’s camp due to the lack of alignment with our inclusive environment.”

    God, these people…

    Susan Smith, from the feminist campaign group For Women Scotland, said: “This is a clear-cut case of discrimination.”…

    “As ever, it seems that ‘inclusion’ only extends to those who share a narrow world view. It is extremely troubling that a charity dealing with children with special needs are insistent that they will coerce them to deny the reality of sex, something that the children may experience as profoundly upsetting and confusing."

  • The BBC misusing its privilege

    urt. This amounts to saying: “We have a shitty internal policy that prioritises a fringe counterfactual belief system over accuracy and impartiality – which are legal requirements in our charter – and if an arm of the state, namely the criminal-justice system, decides to gaslight the nation, we will too.”

    This isn’t journalism; it’s propaganda. And we’re being forced to pay for it via the licence fee. To say that I resent this, having worked in the commercial media sector for almost 20 years during which search engines and social media cannibalised nearly the entire revenue base of journalism, driving countless outlets to the wall, is a gross understatement. The BBC is in an incredibly privileged position, and it misuses that privilege so grossly that it deserves to have it taken away.

    I’m sure lots of people will complain about the young man who killed two children and severely wounded others being referred to as a woman too, and almost certainly with no greater success.

    I'd add their Gaza coverage to the charge sheet – every Hamas press release straight on to front page news – alongside the trans capture.

  • BBC drag queens

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • BBC Verify

    Michael Deacon in the Telegraph – BBC Verify can’t be trusted to tell the true facts – and this trans row proves it:

    “As soon as the name Robin Westman emerged online as the suspect,” wrote a BBC Verify staffer, “[we] found a YouTube channel which appeared to be associated with her.” In a notebook, the staffer added, Westman wrote about “how she [was] planning to shoot without aiming”.

    As far as I can see, there are two possibilities here. Either the BBC’s rigorously impartial fact-checking service has conducted a landmark study of human biology, and confirmed that male child-killers can indeed turn into women. Or its staff are as ardently committed to promoting deeply contentious ideological beliefs as just about everyone else who works for our national broadcaster these days.

  • Accurate language around biological sex

    ing to its diverse audience. The current default, of using preferred pronouns and the words ‘man’ and ‘woman’ according to a person’s ‘gender identity’ is at best highly misleading and at worst a betrayal of the BBC’s public service remit.  

    The adoption of self-identification of sex has eroded trust and harmed vulnerable groups. Reversing it is essential to upholding journalistic integrity and foster informed public discourse….

    The BBC has a duty to ensure that it is not captured by any ideological viewpoint, including gender identity ideology. The belief and understanding that biological sex is binary and unchangeable, and that it matters, are not only legally protected, they are based on fundamental truths.  Yet the BBC persists in telling its audience the opposite. This is a dereliction of the BBC’s Charter responsibilities…

     

  • Treating Israel as an enemy

    it had restored funding to Unrwa, the UN agency, despite allegations that it employed some of the terrorists behind the October 7 2023 massacre….

    As the only UN agency devoted solely to one particular group, it also provides official licence to the idea that Palestinians are permanent refugees whose troubles can only be ended by the destruction of Israel – never mind that its funded schools taught Jew-hatred and the glories of jihad, allowing Hamas to ignore all the tedious business of running a country so they could concentrate on building tunnels and stockpiling arms.

    The UK Government now seems so hostile to Israel, perhaps Israel will take the hint. It is not as if Israel does not have cards to play. The UK and Israel have had decades of cooperation in counter-terrorism and work closely in cyber-security and defence technology. Our joint military exercises have helped keep British troops safe, especially through drone technology, missile defence and radar systems based on Israel’s world-leading expertise.

    Israel has also shared critical counter-terror intelligence with the UK on threats to Britain posed by Iran, ISIS and others. Our intelligence services regard that cooperation as vital to security. If Israel is regarded as a bad actor to be punished, why should it work to help the Government seeking to punish it?

    At a time of grave threats across the globe, when the reliability of the US in these areas may be compromised, we should be deepening and strengthening our links with countries with which we have always worked so well. Instead, we have a Government which regards political posturing, perhaps driven by fear of a Muslim vote backlash, as more important. For shame.

  • Trans violence

    src%5Etfw”>August 29, 2025

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    A comment: "Documenting the transition from "Affirm us or we'll k*ll ourselves" to "Affirm us or we'll k*ll you."