Author: Mick Hartley

  • Joan of Arc (they/them)

    ont-size: 11pt”>Carolyn Brown, a retired psychologist now working with the Women’s Rights Network, said: “This is yet another ridiculous example of attempting to rewrite history and erase strong, rebellious female characters from our past.

    “It’s insulting to suggest that non-conforming women are not women. Non-binary is a nonsense term – indeed the Supreme Court in the UK recently ruled against including it as an option on passports.

    “It’s also another example of the junk science of queer theory being visited on children. It’s unhelpful psychologically to children’s development and is likely to cause confusion and anxiety.”

    It is not the first time Joan of Arc has been dubbed non-binary. In 2022, the Globe Theatre put on the play “I, Joan” which gave her the pronouns “they/them” instead of “she/her”.

    Ah yes.

    In 2022, the Globe’s official X account posted a poem calling gender-critical women ‘bitches’. And at one point during I, Joan, Joan of Arc herself tells the audience that: ‘Women are worried about the wrong things; Twitter and toilets.’

    Even more on the nose, the programme for the show contained an article that claimed that the real-life Joan ‘died for the right to crossdress’. It also declared ‘death before detransition’.

  • Welcome to the ditch

    how blind loyalty and stubbornness led to the election debacle and Trump's second term:

    By April of last year, the health of the president had clearly declined. As with many older men in their eighties, this didn’t happen in a slow, predictable glide-path down — but in swift, turbulent declines. Suddenly he took a while to get out of his limo, and then would emerge “with a blank look in his face,” according to the new campaign book, Fight, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes. By early summer, Biden was suddenly freezing up in public, staring motionless into the air. At a fundraiser in Los Angeles, Obama had to jump in to answer some questions, and then had to guide Biden off the stage by hand. We had already seen Joe wander weirdly off the set of MSNBC and during a Medal of Honor ceremony. His memory lapses mounted….

    Do we learn anything new in this book and another one, Uncharted, by Chris Whipple out next week? Not really. We know, in fact, that everything I guessed happened did actually happen. Among the unsurprising confirmations: Obama was so aloof he didn’t even watch the fateful June debate live; he and Pelosi then wanted an open primary and did all they could to get one. (“He goes. She goes” was their mantra.) Hillary Clinton defended Biden — not because she knew his health was fine, but because her health had once been questioned by the press too. Biden’s closest advisers were his wife and, yes, his son Hunter, and they routinely put their clan’s interests well before the country’s. His inner circle — Mike Donilon especially — were so blindly loyal and informationally siloed they couldn’t absorb what was staring them in the face.

    The Democrats, even as late as July, could have found a fresh candidate capable of taking on what they said was a vital moment for democracy’s survival. We might have avoided our current abyss…

    Why didn’t they? That is a question that will reverberate through history. Wokeness was a factor. The only reason the embarrassingly mid Harris was made veep in the first place was to fill a slot Biden had already marked for a woman, and, in the wake of the Floyd murder, a black woman seemed the only option. Everyone, particularly Pelosi and Obama, knew Harris was a disaster about to happen, and her vice-presidency had the lowest approval ratings in history. Obama told friends directly that he thought she couldn’t win. The night after the epic debate, Pelosi gritted her teeth: “Oh my God. It’s going to be her.” So yes, identity before merit was a principle the Dems clung to even at the expense of marching off an electoral cliff….

    But in the end, the story of 2024 is painfully, excruciatingly human. Biden’s prickly pride and long-nurtured insecurity, the insularity of his too-loyal circle, and the entitlement that comes from decades of public life at the top all led to collective tragedy. We are now living in the wake of this man’s fallibility and stubbornness. It’s a story we all know well in our private capacities: the tale of trying to get grandpa to give up his car keys before he drives into a ditch and hurts someone.

    Well, welcome to the ditch. And the casualties are mounting.

    The disasters were multiple: Biden's refusal to admit his problems, and the misplaced loyalty of his family and circle; the "requirement" for a black woman as veep; and, of course, the "wokeness" factor, and in particular the embrace by all sections of the Dems, and progressive America in general, of gender politics.

  • Anti-socialist and non-socialist monitors

    “The authorities had been inspecting channel locks since early March when they caught some young people watching South Korean television. Since then, anti-socialist and non-socialist monitors have been visiting multiple neighborhood watch units daily to check channel locks and search for flash drives and SD cards,” the source said.

    According to a Daily NK report last month that quoted a source inside the country, state security agents in Ungjin county (South Hwanghae province) and Hyesan (Ryanggang province) have been visiting families to ensure their channel locks are activated.

    The Haeju youths arrested for watching South Korean television are expected to receive severe punishment.

  • “I will not fence this individual”

    women to feel they have to come out for a long battle. At my club, there are girls who are not even five-foot tall. In women’s fencing, they might have an opportunity. But when you start inundating their sport with men, they will have zero chance.”

    Previously a registered Democrat, Turner was persuaded to vote Republican at the last presidential election, out of pure exasperation at the unfairness she has endured. “Sometimes, it feels like my Democrat friends are lying directly to my face,” she says. “I get angry, because of the personal effect this has on my life. I took up fencing because I needed something competitive in my life, where I could make friends, find a lifelong source of exercise. I found so much love chasing the next tournament, the next result. It’s addictive. But it becomes dreadful when the cards are stacked against you.”

    These pathetic sports administrators, with their empty "inclusive" platitudes…what a disgrace. And yes, the Democrats…

    Added: the smug face of USA Fencing…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Mobile cotton cart

    ublishing Company]

  • Not suitable as an educational resource

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • What about the girls?

    Teenage boys are the hot topic now, after the Adolescence storm. It was a girl who was killed, though. Joan Smith at UnHerd:

    A third of teenage girls don’t feel safe at school. That’s the headline finding from new research, showing that the proportion has more than doubled in four years. In 2019, 15% of year 9 girls felt unsafe, compared to 34% in 2023. The fact that girls as young as 13 are scared of going to school should surely shame a civilised country.

    The experience of teenage boys is a hot topic at the moment, thanks to the Netflix drama Adolescence. The Prime Minister has an embarrassing habit of making policy based on what people happen to be talking about at any given time. And while the programme has focused attention on the plight of young boys being infected by the misogynistic ideologies of online influencers like Andrew Tate, the real victim of the show is the young girl who is stabbed to death as a result.

    Adolescence 2, perhaps? The girl's tale. That might make the PM take notice.

    That message is only reinforced by the push for “gender neutral” toilets, removing a single-sex space where girls could take refuge. Schools are clearly failing young women. Do we have to wait for another Netflix series before ministers decide that making schools safe for them is an urgent priority?

  • A sunny day in Hot Springs

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 1906. "Central Avenue South."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Detroit Publishing Company]

  • “The idea that it taps into some sort of universal experience of white British teenage boys…”

    span style=”font-size: 11pt”>When Antoinette Keane – a teacher and the mother of two teenage boys – overheard her colleagues talking excitedly about playing the smash-hit Netflix drama Adolescence to pupils, she was alarmed.

    Keane teaches English and has spent her career showing children how to sort fact from fiction and understand the concepts of bias and perspective. And yet, amid the breathless reactions to the show from the Prime Minister down, she believes a dangerous narrative is being spun that Adolescence has uncovered some sort of truth about boys.

    The four-part drama follows Jamie Miller, a 13-year-old who is arrested for murdering a schoolmate, Katie, after he has been radicalised online. Over the course of the undeniably compelling series, we watch as police visit the local comprehensive, a psychologist evaluates Jamie in prison, and his parents cope with the devastating aftermath of his actions. Tens of millions of people have watched it worldwide – including Sir Keir Starmer, who has now decreed that it should be shown in schools around the country.

    “As a piece of fiction it is very good,” says Keane, “but as the mother of white British teenage boys, I am very against the idea that it taps into some sort of universal experience of white British teenage boys – I live and work with them and can tell you that is simply not the case. If we show it in schools, we are saying we believe that this is who they are.”

    For Keane, there are a number of further problems. Firstly, we are exclusively engaged in Jamie’s world, rather than Katie’s. “It is his story, his challenges, his family, his voice,” she says. “Her voice is erased – that was a creative choice they made, and in terms of art, it works very well, but it is a disaster as an educational resource.”

    She also believes that a drama with a damning view of education probably shouldn’t be shown in schools. “In the second episode, there is only one competent teacher,” she says. “The others are putting on videos instead of teaching, while the well-meaning but ineffective head teacher doesn’t instil any confidence. Nobody stops or changes or guides pupil behaviour. Not only is this not fair – there are good, nurturing teachers everywhere – but if you show this in a school, you are undermining yourself as you do so. You are saying, ‘We are powerless’.

    We, the teachers, are powerless – and you, young lads, are potential scum. Give you access to social media and you turn into killers.

    ”Ultimately, what we should have learnt by now is that education by television rarely works. “Adolescence is an incredible piece of storytelling that has opened a lot of people’s eyes to the issues of sexism and misogyny amongst young people,” says Sean McGrath, a director who has written a play about trauma and consent that is now performed in schools around the country.

    “But we must remember that [Adolescence] was written to inform and influence an adult audience, and in my opinion, is not age-appropriate for young teenagers. Showing it in schools is a bit like using Schindler’s List to teach Year 7s about antisemitism, or Requiem for a Dream to warn them about drugs – powerful, yes, but not created with the developmental, emotional, or psychological needs of young people in mind.”