Author: Mick Hartley

  • Sex and gender

    t to the recording of sex and gender. It found that sex, gender, and gender identity have become conflated in research and clinical datasets in recent years. This may have occurred because gender has been used as a synonym for sex, with some clinicians, researchers, or administrators misunderstanding the distinctions. But some individuals and organisations have lobbied for gender identity to be collected instead of, not in addition to, sex with deliberate merging of categories….

    It's not complicated. 

  • Not everything is about them

    t some of our service-users didn’t seek help before we opened, because they didn’t want a male providing their therapy, or for men to be accessing what they needed to feel was a completely safe space. However, if a woman was happy with a male support worker, or with males also using the service, she could of course choose the alternative rape crisis centre.

    Some men, trans-identified and not, disagree that even the most vulnerable and traumatised women should be allowed to exclude men from rape crisis centres, yet many women see a male-free space and service as the last or only chance of putting their lives back together. It takes immense courage even to pick up the phone to access help after rape. Yet, even at their worst moment, these women told by activists like Willoughby that their priority should be centering his feelings, pandering to his ‘identity’ and pretending that they don’t recognise his narcissism and aggression as a quintessentially male response to not being given what he wants, by women.

    The simple truth is that no decent male, however they identify, would ever seek to breach the boundaries of women whose sense of self and safety has been shattered by their experience of male violence or rape. 98% of sexual predators are male. 88% of sexual crime victims are female. Beira’s Place exists because I saw an unmet need and the fact that we’ve been so busy since we’ve opened proves, not that women hate trans-identified men, but that this is where women feel safe enough to deal with trauma they might otherwise have had to carry with them forever.

    As has been noted, many trans supporters (Maggie Chapman, Owen Jones) have been shouting ever since the Supreme Court ruling that women should have been spending their time and money on support for VAWG (Violence against Women and Girls) causes rather than being nasty to trans people. Well Rowling did just that – and they're furious about it. 

  • The news from BBC Arabic

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    From the Telegraph:

    A journalist who appears prominently on the BBC’s Arabic channel to report from Gaza called for Jews to be burned “as Hitler did”, it can be revealed.

    Samer Elzaenen has appeared on BBC Arabic more than a dozen times since the conflict erupted following the October 7 Hamas attacks on southern Israel….

    In a Facebook post in July 2022, he stated: “When things go awry for us, shoot the Jews, it fixes everything.”

    Elzaenen has also appeared to call for a repeat of the Holocaust, stating on Facebook in May 2011: “My message to the Zionist Jews: We are going to take our land back, we love death for Allah’s sake the same way you love life. We shall burn you as Hitler did, but this time we won’t have a single one of you left.”

    He's not the only one.

    Ahmed Qannan, another regular BBC Arabic freelance contributor, appears to have expressed his hope that Israelis wounded in a shooting near a Jerusalem synagogue, which claimed the lives of seven civilians on Holocaust Memorial Day in January 2023, would also die.

    Writing on Facebook in response to a friend who stated “We want to see some throats cut”, Qannan replied: “Don’t give up on your ambition”. Qannan also described a 26-year-old Palestinian who killed four civilians and a police officer in a series of shootings in the Israeli city of Bnei Brak in March 2022, as a “hero”.

    As the article goes on to state, these people aren't direct employees of BBC Arabic: they're freelance, which means the Beeb can continue to use them while denying direct responsibility. The wider point though, which the BBC refuses to acknowledge, is that any reporter operating inside Gaza must be Hamas-approved – otherwise they wouldn't be reporting and would most likely be shot. These two just happened to be a bit careless with their social media.

  • A triumph of entitlement and narcissism

    Janice Turner in the Times:

    At last Saturday’s demonstration against the Supreme Court ruling, a burly, gravel-voiced, 50-something man in a baby-doll nightie was interviewed about lavatories. “If I walked into a men’s toilets like this, I’m just asking for trouble,” he said. “It only takes one obnoxious idiot.”

    Maybe he shouldn't dress up in his fetish gear.

    How is he treated in the ladies? “A woman wouldn’t do it. End of.” He’d just used female loos at Waterloo station and “none of the women batted an eyelid when I walked in. I’ve got no problem with going in the ladies. They’ve got no problem. So I’m not going to stop.”

    Really, it’s a mystery why women in an enclosed space would avoid the eye of a broad-shouldered, tough-looking geezer in fetish gear. It’s truly a triumph of entitlement and narcissism to read such silence as approval, but if women are mere non-player characters in your life’s exciting video game, why would you clock their watchfulness, unease or fear?

    It's not the violence these men are worried about in the men's toilets: it's the ridicule. They wouldn't be attacked: if anything they'd be jeered. 

    It's the same old story. Men are afraid of being laughed at; women are afraid of being killed.

  • EHRC interim update

    Useful update from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission – An interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment.

    Key information

    The Supreme Court ruled that in the Equality Act 2010 (the Act), ‘sex’ means biological sex.

    This means that, under the Act:

      • A ‘woman’ is a biological woman or girl (a person born female)

      • A ‘man’ is a biological man or boy (a person born male) 

    If somebody identifies as trans, they do not change sex for the purposes of the Act, even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).

      • A trans woman is a biological man

      • A trans man is a biological woman

    This judgment has implications for many organisations, including:

      • workplaces
      • services that are open to the public, such as hospitals, shops, restaurants, leisure facilities, refuges and counselling services

      • sporting bodies

      • schools

      • associations (groups or clubs of more than 25 people which have rules of membership)

    In workplaces, it is compulsory to provide sufficient single-sex toilets, as well as sufficient single-sex changing and washing facilities where these facilities are needed.

  • Pony, Montana

    Arthur Rothstein, June 1939. "A ghost mining town. Pony, Montana."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Arthur Rothstein for the Farm Security Administration]

  • “Keir comes across as not exactly human…”

    k Supreme Court ruling that sex in the Equality Act refers to biology, the prime minister has finally asserted that a “woman is an adult female” but has resisted calls to apologise to Duffield for her treatment.

    She is not interested. “I don’t really feel like I need that. And it wouldn’t be a sincere apology. Keir comes across as not exactly human, not exactly involved in this and not empathetic and not understanding the issue.

    “Sentiment can be written by someone else for you to say. Proper, deep-rooted understanding and empathy? That’s something you can’t manufacture, and that is very lacking in him when talking about this.”

    Very lacking in him when talking about anything. He doesn't do sincerity, only that robotic "sincerity". By no means the only politician that's true of, for sure, but still…

    Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons Speaker, failed to call on Duffield to speak during PMQs. She wanted to ask the prime minister for an apology over Labour activists and members who had been sidelined and disciplined for offering pro-women views.

    It's been suggested, plausibly, that this was deliberate. Hoyle and Starmer are old pals.

     

  • Azaleas

    img alt=”IMG_3669s” class=”asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451ebab69e202e860ff9189200d img-responsive” src=”http://mickhartley.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/mt_imported_image_1758236754.jpg” style=”width: 550px” title=”IMG_3669s” />

    IMG_3672s

    IMG_3679s

    IMG_3687s

    IMG_3697s

    IMG_3699s

    IMG_3702s

    IMG_3704s

    IMG_3705s

    IMG_3701s

  • There’s a plaque near Swindon

    The Guardian has concerns:

    The supreme court’s decision might, for some, revive a Victorian idea: to protect women legally, we must define them biologically.  Efforts to ringfence women’s spaces could end up excluding trans people entirely.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • On the history of “Palestine”

    the real story of how "Palestine" has been appropriated by the Arabs:

    The land “from the river to the sea,” to use the now-ubiquitous slogan, has been known as Palestine only twice before. First, the Roman Emperor Hadrian used “Palestina” as a way of suppressing Jewish resistance to his imperial rule. Second, it was used under the British Mandate, which was entrusted to Britain with the purpose of “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”

    In both cases, it was understood that “Palestine” simply denoted the territory where there had been, or would be, a Jewish homeland. This is why the League of Nations, in establishing the Mandate, did so to “give recognition to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine,” thereby forming “the grounds for reconstituting the Jewish people’s national home in that country.” This is also why local organizations at the time freely used the word “Palestine” in connection to entirely Jewish entities: The Palestine Post, for instance, which later became The Jerusalem Post, or the Palestine Philharmonic, later the Israel Philharmonic. Football associations with players bearing names such as Kastenbaum, Friedmann, Nudelman, and Kraus, as well as coins, bore the name Palestine (but always with a mention of “Eretz Israel,” the Land of Israel).

    Nor was that all. The Mandate gave Britain the option to separate the territory east of the River Jordan out of the area mandated for a Jewish home. What became Transjordan, and later Jordan, was forbidden to Jewish settlement. The remaining areas are, fantastically, now called “historic Palestine.” As Shany and I observed, “they are ‘historic’ only insofar as they lasted for barely three decades, were governed by a European superpower, and delimited as the future national home for the Jewish people.”

    With independence, the Jewish people then did what every self-respecting nation that achieved independence did in the world at the same time. They shed the colonial name given to their territory (Siam, Gold Coast, Ceylon, Rhodesia, and, yes, Palestine) and replaced it with one rooted in its own culture, geography, and history: Israel.

    It was only after Israel declared independence, and especially in the 1960s and ’70s, that the Arabs of the land increasingly appropriated the name Palestine to indicate an Arab identity that possesses the sole exclusive “indigenous” claim to any land controlled by sovereign Jews. In doing so, they inverted and erased two millennia of customary association of the land with the Jews and their history, thereby turning the Jews, whose continuous historical, cultural, and religious connection to the land was never previously questioned, into the “foreign interlopers” in an Arab land to which they have no connection. At the end of this process, the associated meanings of the word “Palestine,” of a history and connection of one people to one land (the Jews to Eretz Israel) were thereby transferred to those who have newly taken the name: the Arabs.