Author: Mick Hartley

t.co/ppNt1EEg72″>pic.twitter.com/ppNt1EEg72

— We Stand With Israel (@SussexFriends) February 22, 2024

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

espread hunger to create political pressure on Israel & ensure that Gazans are too weak to challenge the group's authority. That's why it's crucial to get large quantities of food into the north as soon as possible through airdrops to guarantee that the population doesn't starve. It is vital to foil Hamas's designs to hide behind widespread famine, which is inevitable at this point, in large part due to Israel's blocking of food supplies/trucks going into the besieged City. Nevertheless, it is shameful that the @WFP halted deliveries of food into the north at a time when the need is the greatest and didn't publicly and diplomatically push for continued access to Gaza.

Will China be supporting armed Uyghur resistance in East Turkestan, then????

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤨🤨🤨 https://t.co/TDWok644Fh

— John Aziz (@aziz0nomics) February 22, 2024

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

: 11pt”>The BBC didn’t think it necessary to quiz the trainee consultant, to examine the study she cited or to ask how it could possibly be true that trans milk is actually suddenly more nutritious than the milk from a biological mother. Neither the babies nor the truth matter any more.

For more detail see Milli Hill's thorough debunking. The expert so credulously interviewed by the BBC, Kate Luxion, is a "non-binary/genderqueer postgraduate researcher studying at University College London with a focus on LGBTQ+ reproductive health and parenting", and not a qualified expert on lactation. No, the one study cited did not show that trans milk is actually more nutritious than mother's milk, but it's clearly the ideological line the Beeb is happy to run with. Yay, trans women – men – are better than women, even at producing baby milk.

e=”padding-left: 40px”>‘People are frightened. People have weaponised this debate in this Chamber. Whips are frightened for their flocks because Members of parliament now feel that they have to vote in a certain way in order to safeguard their safety and that of their family. That is a far bigger issue than the debate we are having tonight, because if people are changing their votes or their behaviour in this place because they are frightened of what may happen to them or their family out there, we have a real problem. So this point scoring off each other is not going to resolve many issues.’

And Isabel Hardman:

MPs shouldn’t be changing their votes because of threats. That’s not how democracy works. It has, however, been sliding that way for a good while: members have been self-censoring and avoiding certain debates because of the amount of abuse they get on social media about a whole range of issues. But the idea that MPs would have to vote a certain way to calm the mob that was online, in their constituencies and indeed in Westminster yesterday is still a big move from that.

MPs have been under intolerable pressure in some cases. I have spoken to a number who have stopped going out on their own and who say they feel genuinely relieved when they get out of their constituencies. They also raised concerns with the Speaker last night about their safety: it wasn’t just Starmer who tried to make the case for the Labour amendment being selected using the safety argument.

Hoyle has come under a huge amount of opprobrium over the past few hours, and that will continue today. But just imagine the reaction if a Labour MP had been attacked or their children threatened and they linked it to the fact they hadn’t been able to vote for a motion they could support on Palestine. In the fickle world of Westminster, it’s entirely likely that the narrative this morning would be ‘why couldn’t the Speaker change the rules on this sensitive topic to help MPs stay safe?’ We are all excellent at hindsight, and when it comes to MPs’ safety, hindsight weighs very heavily when there have been two murders in the past decade.

The problem is that the Speaker’s selection will not make MPs safer, because it has suggested to the people putting this pressure on members that they can force democracy to move through threats. We all respond to incentives, and Hoyle’s well-meaning attempt to help MPs has unwittingly offered an incentive to campaigners to keep intimidating members. Neither parliament nor the political parties have really worked out how to deal with the new era of mob politics. But they’re going to have to learn fast.

ing to death. People who know the siblings’ situation feel very sorry for them,” the source said.

“No wonder people say you should just live for the moment because death could be lurking around every corner. People are afraid that even if they’re making good money now, they could end up like the Lee family. The reality for North Koreans is that life is a ticking time bomb.”

size: 11pt”>Most of those sexually assaulted by Hamas terrorists were killed afterward, and some even during the act of rape. Others still were found dead later, their genitals mutilated beyond recognition or penetrated with weapons.

The leaders of Hamas have made it clear that this is their strategy – to rebuild and repeat. Perhaps those calling for a ceasefire and an end to the violence might, reading this, begin to understand why it's something that Israel just cannot allow.

Update: here's the ARCCI report.

The report clearly demonstrates that this is not a "malfunction" or isolated incident but a clear operational strategy involving systematic, targeted sexual abuse. The report focuses on sexual and gender-based violence during the massacre of October 7, 2023, and the war that ensued, serving as a primary testimonial foundation indicating widespread sexual crimes.

of their assigned gender,” it reads.

Sarah Atherton, the MP who oversaw the 2021 report which examined the levels of sexual assault and harassment in the military, said the policy felt like a “knee-jerk reaction”.

“They haven’t thought this through properly,” she said.

Well how much thinking does it take? Men shouldn't be in female-only accommodation, whether they like to wear dresses or just the usual trousers. As always, the concerns of the women are simply not considered. 

“Having done extensive work around women in the Armed Forces, I am fully aware of the extent of sexual abuse that has gone on and continues to go on. Women need to have secure accommodation where they feel safe.”

They have an ongoing issue of failing to deal with sexual abuse – so now they're planning to let men into the women's accommodation.

Washington, ca. 1901. "View of Eighth Street N.W., east side, looking north from D Street with Hoy's Hotel on the corner and the U.S. Patent Office building at the end of the street."

[Photo: Shorpy/D.C. Street Survey Collection]

to suffer cruel and unusual punishment. #WomensRightsAreHumanRights

Malcolm Tucker:

I worked in the female prison estate. These girls had absolutely horrendous stories of abuse by men.

Some couldn’t even look at me as a male officer as they were literally terrified of men. It took me months to even be able to make eye contact and get their trust.

I have heard and read stories that I couldn’t even type here or want to think about. Serious self harm and suicide attempts were a daily occurrence, this is how hurt and emotionally broken they were.

I later worked with male sex offenders.

I can state two facts based on my experience.

1. There is ZERO place for biological male prisoners in female prisons. Their very presence is cruel and incredibly dangerous.

2. Sex offenders are by their very nature some of the most intelligent, cunning and manipulative type of offender you will encounter. They will find any loophole possible to carry on their offending.

They will – and I have evidence from friends still in the job that this is being discussed amongst their kind – use these new ridiculous cult beliefs to access women’s spaces and offend.

Using a loophole to call themselves a female to get into the women’s prisons, a far nicer environment and a safe space from retaliation by other male prisoners is simply too good to be true for these types. If we don’t stand up and talk against this, regardless of the costs to our profiles this will become a vile and cruel system.

I can assure you all that there has been sexual assaults on female prisoners by these evil men. But it is being covered up as the MoJ simply have to record it as – wait for it – female on female assault. Not investigated.