Author: Mick Hartley

  • Back in the closet

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Packard entrance

    Detroit ca. 1908. "Packard touring car and tented entrance to club or dwelling."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Detroit Publishing]

  • ‘Nobody is coming to help us’

    not put the dreams of all these girls on hold, they have obliterated them.”…

    A United Nations survey last December found that 76% of women and girls who responded classed their mental health as “bad” or “very bad”, reporting insomnia, depression, anxiety, loss of appetite and headaches as a result of their trauma.

    Almost one-fifth of girls and women also said they hadn’t met another woman outside their immediate family in the three preceding months. Another survey from the Afghan digital platform Bishnaw found that 8% of those who took part knew at least one woman or girl who had attempted to kill themselves since August 2021….

    Barr says the Taliban have taken away “girl’s social networks, their friends, the outside world”. “They can’t go to school, or to national parks, or beauty salons or the gym or, increasingly, outside the house at all without fear of intimidation. They’re taking away everything that makes them human,” she says.

    She says the international community cannot continue to ignore what is happening to teenage girls in Afghanistan.

    But they will. It's not an issue that seems to concern anyone. 

  • Labour campaigning

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Penguin demands

    From Patrick Harvie of the Scottish Greens. Possibly:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Struggling to cast women

    e=”padding-left: 40px”>A play that criticises JK Rowling’s views on gender is struggling to cast women with 90 actresses so far rejecting parts.

    The stage production, which is set to debut at the Edinburgh Fringe, has already caused outrage over a working title which labelled the gender-critical Harry Potter author a c—-.

    The production is yet to cast any of the female roles, including that of Rowling herself.

    The part of Harry Potter film star Emma Watson has also been repeatedly turned down, and around 90 actresses have refused to take part in the project amid concerns over its critique of Rowling….

    Actors have been found for male leads, who will portray Harry Potter cast members Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe.

    Creative producer Barry Church-Woods told the Telegraph: “This project has met some kind of resistance every step of the way, though I’ve been generally surprised by how difficult it has been for us to recruit the female cast in particular.

    “It’s a well-paid gig meeting industry standards and the script is terrific.”…

    It has been suggested by producers that some actresses may not want to appear in a play critiquing Rowling and ruin their chances of appearing in the lucrative new Harry Potter TV series on the Max streaming service.

    Rowling is acting as executive producer for the series, and will be involved in key decision-making.

    Mr Church-Woods said: “We’ve had agents reluctant to put names forward, I suspect, because they do not want to damage their clients chances of landing roles on the new Potter TV series.”

    Well of course, yes, that must be it. The men, inspired by the terrific script and unconcerned about any possible damage to their careers or chances of featuring in the high-paying Harry Potter franchise, don't have a problem. For them art comes before money. For the venal grasping women, alas, it's a different story.

    Or it could be that they find the whole thing deeply offensive, while the men are happy to join in with the abuse of women who speak out.

  • Free binders

    Pride, now:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Stonewall lite

    e that Dr Hilary Cass has warned against any such ban, suggesting it might “make professional fearfulness worse than it already is”. So Labour has added a line about “protecting the freedom for people to explore their sexual orientation and gender identity”, directly contradicting the first half of the pledge….

    Starmer’s Labour party believes that human beings can change sex. It insists they should be helped to do so in law, regardless of the impact on women. It supports “the implementation of…single-sex exceptions” in the Equality Act, but won’t make a simple change that would prevent malicious challenges to organisations running rape shelters and refuges.

    In a bad week for women, the Lib Dems and Greens have embraced self-ID, while Labour is well on the way. If this general election has done nothing else, it has confirmed how few politicians are listening to women. Across the centre-left, these demands are in the ascendant, and that leaves a lot of us with nowhere to go — and no one to vote for.

    And Kate Barker at Spiked:

    The Labour Party’s manifesto, unveiled earlier this week, promises to bring forward legislation for a ‘trans inclusive’ ban on conversion therapy. This will send a chill through the consulting rooms of therapists around the UK….

    There’s no doubt that gender dysphoria is real. Girls, in particular, are expert at turning their adolescent distress inwards. Anorexia, bulimia and cutting are all expressions of self-hatred and fear. These should be met with empathy and counselling. The lobbyists for a conversion-practices ban urge an affirmation-only approach that would assist in the self-harm of girls by handing them control of the scalpel.

    Therapists who demure will face challenges from furious lobbyists and may find themselves disbarred, or even criminalised. Those therapists who don’t believe in magical genders, and recognise that trans is a social contagion now primarily affecting young girls, will simply avoid this area of practice altogether. That means reduced provision at a time when child mental-health services are already so stretched that they are failing the most vulnerable.

    The timing is terrible on Labour’s part. Its manifesto commitment arrives just as the scientific facts and evidence begin to intrude upon the fantasy of ‘trans joy’. A recently released study, based on outpatient-billing data for all legally insured persons in Germany, shows that the majority of young people outgrow their struggles with their gender identity. It notes that 73 per cent of 15- to 19-year-old females with a gender-identity-related diagnosis desist after five years. Yet Labour, in hock to an old promise, has decided that a conversion-practices ban is the least-worst bone to throw to activists.

    It's like demanding that anorexic teens be immediately confirmed in their belief that they're really too fat and should go on a starvation diet – and anyone suggesting otherwise must be punished.

  • Gender modality

    r’ and ‘transgender’, but the term allows for other possibilities, such as ‘agender’, which includes those who do not identify with any gender, and ‘detrans’ or ‘retrans’ for people who have ceased, shifted or reversed their gender transition. The term also makes space for gender modalities specific to intersex individuals, gender-questioning people, people with dissociative identity disorder and people with culture-specific identities (see ‘Many ways of being’). Gender modality serves a similar purpose to sexual orientation, which describes a facet of human existence and makes space for orientations beyond gay and straight.

    But a word of caution, lest our enthusiasm carries us away.

    Gender modality is not a panacea. Rather, it is one piece in the toolbox of those who engage in research involving human participants, whether in the medical, biological or social sciences. Its power lies in what people make of it. Our hope is that researchers and others will play with it, stretching it and exploring its full potential. Rather than foreclosing the evolution of language, gender modality welcomes it.

    Not everyone is male or female. Not everyone is cis or trans. The sooner we make space for these truths, the better. And inviting scientists to adopt the concept of gender modality will hopefully foster research that better reflects the intricacies and nuances of our increasingly gender-expansive world.

    The first step in science should never be to assume that something is correct. It should be to engage with the world in front of us — in all its magnificent complexity. Researching gender should begin with critically engaging with current language and concepts. Thoughtfulness, flexibility, curiosity and empathy are what science needs.

    Some kind of connection with reality? Is that something science needs?

    Apparently not.

    One of the authors, Florence Ashley, is "metaphorically a biorg witch with flowers in their hair!" 

    Florence is a transfeminine jurist, bioethicist, public speaker, and advocate. They are the author of the acclaimed book Gender/Fucking: The Pleasures and Politics of Living in a Gendered Body (CLASH Books, 2024).

    [Via Jerry Coyne.].

  • Do you mean the Jews?

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js