es to preserve peace and justice. But this lofty ideal, enshrined in the UN Charter, is at serious variance with the facts of the UN’s history.
After the Korean War, the UN stood by and did nothing for four decades as some of the worst crimes against humanity were committed across and within borders. It did nothing when the Soviet Union imposed its will by force on Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan. It did nothing to stop Pol Pot’s genocidal wars in South East Asia or the Indonesian cremation of East Timor. Just as Mao Zedong was busy executing anyone who expressed the slightest reservation about the wisdom of the Cultural Revolution, he was rewarded by being given a seat on the Security Council.
At the very moments when these hideous events were falling like blows on the face of freedom, the main obsession of the UN was with condemning Israel’s attempts to ensure its own survival in the face of Arab determination to wipe it out. Though it apparently could not be persuaded that totalitarian dictatorship was incompatible with its founding principles, the UN General Assembly did find the time to condemn Zionism as racism.
Of course, its defenders say, that was in the Cold War, when the world was regrettably divided into hostile camps, and the UN Security Council was checkmated by the veto from doing anything of substance.
Since then things have changed. Look at the first Gulf War. Didn’t that show how international co-operation through the UN can confer legitimacy on the use of force in the defence of law and justice? Well, perhaps. Some of us would argue that it was the need to keep that unwieldy coalition from collapsing that the war was not prosecuted to its proper conclusion — the removal of Saddam Hussein.
But even if this was a fine moment, it was also clearly the high-water mark of post-Cold War UN action. The UN quickly fell back into its familiar torpor. It failed in the Balkans. It did nothing to stop genocide in Africa. And Iraq — well we know about Iraq. The truth is, if we had waited for the UN’s say-so to promote the cause of freedom in the past 50 years, we’d still be waiting.
Freedom is on the march around the world. What the UN needs now is to get in front of that glorious procession, rather than lag behind it. John Bolton may be the man for the task.
His diplomacy has earned him some serious opprobrium. North Korea once described him as “human scum”. Which, if you stop to think about that country and its contribution to human history, is one heck of a compliment.