Author: Mick Hartley

  • A queer bestial ethics of avowal

    jonkay/status/1880334445103996935?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>January 17, 2025

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Abstract:

    We argue in this paper that what separates permissible from perverse acts of killing, or sex with, an animal is a matter of material and symbolic space. We focus on interspecies sex –which is often, but not always, bound up with killing –to argue that what separates permissible from perverse acts of interspecies sex in India, or husbandry from bestiality, is where it occurs geographically in proximity to an upper-caste, anthropatriarchal imaginary of a Hindu nation. We argue that the state-sanctioned abattoir and its breeding facility are spaces of normalized exception, in which anthropatriarchal violences are relatively permissible, and on the same grounds as in the “human” space of the home. We trace interspecies sexual contact across spheres of bestiality, animal husbandry, petkeeping, and population control. We conclude with a queer bestial ethics of avowal, one that dispenses with anthopatriarchal innocence towards a more capacious embrace of the panspecies desire for touch and thriving.

    The panspecies desire for touch and thriving. – or, sex with animals, and why it's really fun. Throw off the anthropatriarchal chains and live!

  • By the shores of Winnipesaukee

    Ca. 1906. "Lake Winnipesaukee, New Hampshire. The New Hotel Weirs and Soldiers' Monument." 

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Detroit Publishing Company]

  • The return of the cotton ceiling

    an Culture for Trans Femme”. Remember: “trans femmes” are male. The app focuses entirely on the validation of the “trans femmes”, without any acknowledgment that other people — you know, women — may be involved….

    This is essentially an invasion manual. It shamelessly encourages men who self-define as lesbians to “claim their space” in the lesbian community.

    Four of the six-strong VODA team are also BACP members. Their involvement in this app is unclear, but they have certainly not distanced themselves from it. The app seems to be a profound breach of the BACP’s Ethical Framework (2018)….

    The message promoted by the VODA app — and by “LGBTQ+” and former human rights organisations — is that “male lesbians” are victims to be coddled while the rights of actual lesbians don’t matter. I’m sick of this upside-down logic. People born male cannot be lesbian and should not be encouraged to invade lesbian spaces. To see a therapists’ organisation cheering on this violation demonstrates that the “cotton ceiling” discourse is alive and well.

    I hope the BACP will be receiving a strongly-worded complaint about this grotesque app, which encourages men to trample on lesbians’ right to dignity and to their right of association.

    You think a battle's been won, and…zonk…up it pops again. Playing whack-a-mole with the trans activists.

  • Thinking uncritically

    sh&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>#Holocaust. Judge for yourselves: pic.twitter.com/ts7wUANUv7

    — Daniel Mendelsohn (@DAMendelsohnNYC) January 17, 2025

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Anne-frank1

    Anne-frank2

    Added: see Cynthia Ozick's New Yorker article fom 1997, Who Owns Anne Frank?

    But the diary in itself, richly crammed though it is with incident and passion, cannot count as Anne Frank’s story. A story may not be said to be a story if the end is missing. And because the end is missing, the story of Anne Frank in the fifty years since “The Diary of a Young Girl” was first published has been bowdlerized, distorted, transmuted, traduced, reduced; it has been infantilized, Americanized, homogenized, sentimentalized; falsified, kitschified, and, in fact, blatantly and arrogantly denied. 

  • Eddie Hamlet

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Intolerance and ideological capture within Whitehall

    So she decided to fight back.

    But first she wrote to Fiona Ryland, the government chief people officer, to say principles mattered more to her than money. If DCMS and DSIT admitted their gender guidance was illegal and offered to revise it, Frances would settle in return for a decent job reference and £1.

    This was declined and the case rumbled on, until this week she received an exceptional payout of almost £117,000 net. Why did Whitehall fold? Because the case had passed from HR — which still operates under Stonewall law, as if the Forstater ruling never happened — to government lawyers who saw they would lose, and that senior civil servants would have to explain at a public tribunal what Frances calls a “politicised climate of fear”. Compelling two permanent secretaries, Susannah Storey and Sarah Munby, to make a joint statement smacks of ministerial frustration: sort this out, don’t do it again.

    Because all of it is madness. Why was each department allowed to make up its own gender policy rather than adhere to one central guide based upon a clear, legal reading of the Equality Act? Why aren’t civil servants promoted on the basis of talent, not an ideological test of whether they can recite the “correct” EDI dictums? Why are some government departments, including the DCMS, still members of Stonewall’s Diversity Champions scheme, shelling out scant public funds to win gold stars for policies that are both illegal and ridiculous, such as erasing the word “mother” from government documents on maternity rights?

    This is not only a Labour problem: Eleanor Frances began her ordeal when the culture secretary was Nadine Dorries. It is about unaccountable institutions with staff who see themselves as activists, not public servants; who believe they know better than the law or the voters who pay their wages. Frances sacrificed a promising civil service career to bring this farrago into the spotlight — and she would have done it for just a quid.

    Institutions like the Civil Service unfortunately attract and promote the sort of people who keep their heads down, don't make trouble, and get ahead by playing the game. As such they're ripe for exploitation by these of-the-moment social movements, like DEI in general and gender woo in particular, that the ambitious can embrace and promote with enthusiasm. Thank god then for the awkward ones. 

  • Hamas celebrations

    the cultural psyche of its supporters. For decades, this worldview has been reinforced through education systems, media narratives, and religious discourse that valorise violence as a legitimate and even noble response to perceived grievances….

    The international community often misunderstands or overlooks this aspect of Hamas’s ideology, focusing instead on the material and humanitarian dimensions of the conflict. While these are undeniably important, they cannot fully explain the group’s behaviour or motivations. The focus on killing Jews as an act of religious and ideological fulfilment is not a byproduct of desperation or poverty; it is a central tenet of Hamas’s mission. This ideology fuels their willingness to sacrifice the wellbeing of Gaza’s population in pursuit of their goals, framing suffering as a necessary and even desirable cost in the struggle against Israel.

    These dynamics are reinforced by Hamas’s control over Gaza’s media and public discourse. The organisation carefully curates the narrative, portraying each attack on Israel as a step toward liberation and framing every loss of Palestinian life as a heroic sacrifice. This propaganda machine ensures that the population remains ideologically aligned with Hamas’s goals, even as they bear the brunt of the suffering caused by its actions. The post-conflict celebrations are not spontaneous expressions of relief or victory but orchestrated displays of loyalty to an ideology that prioritises resistance above all else.

    The international community’s reluctance to confront the ideological roots of Hamas allows this dynamic to persist. By framing the conflict solely in terms of territory or humanitarian crises, many overlook the extent to which Hamas is driven by a worldview that glorifies violence and martyrdom. This ideological foundation ensures that no ceasefire, negotiation, or reconstruction effort can fully address the conflict as long as Hamas remains committed to its ultimate goal: the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jews from the region.

    In these celebrations, Hamas has revealed its true priorities. It is not marking the survival of Gaza’s population, the rebuilding of its society, or the potential for peace. Instead, it is celebrating death – the deaths of Jews, the deaths of its own fighters, and the deaths yet to come. This stark reality underscores the challenge of achieving lasting peace in a conflict where one side views violence not as a regrettable necessity but as a cause for celebration.

    Meanwhile students across the West see Hamas as heroic fighters against settler colonialism, and – joining hands with the jihadists – happily swallow all the antisemitism that comes with the Hamas package. We have a new generation, presuming themselves to be progressive and on the left, with an alarming resemblance to the old fascist and Nazi groups we thought were confined to the history books.

  • Batley 1970

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Bittersweet. Batley is now best known for other reasons.

  • Turn of the century America

    160;Forsyth Street."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    Jacksonville, Florida, ca. 1900. "Duval County Courthouse."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    Ca. 1901. "St. James Street, Montreal, Quebec."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    1902. "Characteristic employees' home, National Cash Register, Dayton, O."
    [Photos: Shorpy/William Henry Jackson, Detroit Photographic Company]

  • A light sentence

    ng. She also noted that his ex-partner, the mother of the victim, had not fully validated his gender identity after he expressed it.

    So the mother was to blame. Of course she was. The poor man was struggling with gender dysphoria and his bitch of a wife wouldn't fully validate his new gender identity. What else could he do but repeatedly sexually abuse their young daughter?

    “Compounding matters, you had only started to transition in around 2021 and your gender identity was not fully accepted by those around you, including [ex-partner]. Your Counsel submits that at the relevant time you were ‘completely lacking connection in [your] life’ and were experiencing ‘pervasive feelings of rejection and lack of self-worth,'” the Judge stated.

    Harper was ultimately sentenced to 4 years and 9 months imprisonment, a steep drop from the maximum 25 year sentence that was available. Prior to delivering the decision, Judge Karapanagiotidis noted that the sentence was lenient, noting: “the sentence that I am about to impose on this charge is lower than the standard sentence.”

    He will be eligible for parole just 2 years and 6 months into his sentence.