Author: Mick Hartley

  • Gender care

    evidence is strong and in support of centers that provides this kind of care and have been doing so for decades,” said Dr. Kellan Baker, executive director of the Whitman-Walker Institute, a health care organization that works on LGBTQ+ issues.

    That was written (or rather, last amended) just over a month ago. This what the US medical establishment believes, now – though, yes, before Trump. It's Orwellian stuff: the medical mutilation of troubled teens as "gender affirming care". As a medical scandal this surely dwarfs anything before. How on earth did it get to this?

    As for the Cass Review:

    This year, an extensive but controversial research review in the UK called the use of puberty-delaying medications into question, saying that the rationale for early puberty suppression was “unclear” and that any benefit for mental health was supported by “weak evidence.” The review — known as the Cass Review for Dr. Hilary Cass, the pediatrician who conducted it — has prompted providers in the UK to scale back their use of the treatment. However, its methodology have come under sharp criticism from some scholars and practitioners.

    Hmm.

  • The Holocaust has become a vehicle for undoing the Jews

    might as well have just spelled it out. Listen up, Jews. Stop whingeing. The Holocaust is not about you.

    Only it is. That’s the whole point. The fetish for deracinating the Shoah from its victims is nothing less than a fresh attempt to erase us. This year, we were told, Holocaust Memorial Day commemorated not just the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz but also the 30th anniversary of the genocide in Bosnia. To which I say: Why can’t the Bosnians – and the Rwandans, Cambodians and Darfurians, for that matter – have their own ceremony?

    If people want to observe a “Genocide Memorial Day”, that’s fine. But this year proved that relativisation has always been the prelude to erasure. The smarmy ecumenicals have been picking Jewish pockets of our anguish, then telling us that we never owned it in the first place. […]

    In 2025, mourning the Holocaust has become a vehicle for undoing the Jews. When the Irish president took to the stage in Dublin and proceeded to defile our pain by dragging it through the rubble of Gaza, he was echoing an ancient precedent. Norwich, 1144: The Jews killed little William. Berlin, 1934: Die Juden sind unser Unglück. Dublin, 2025: It’s sad about the Holocaust and everything but what really matters is Gaza. Especially the children.

    Several Jews turned their backs on Higgins and were manhandled and ejected. We were left with certain questions. As the security guards dragged a Jewish woman – a historian of the Shoah at that – from a ceremony to mourn her dead, did they not sense a certain irony? What to make of the fact that two Holocaust survivors, Tomi Reichental and Suzi Diamond, had begged Higgins not to bring Gaza into his speech and were ignored? And where is all this leading?

    I’m dreading next year. Like I said: is there a point to Holocaust Memorial Day any longer? The King’s visit to Auschwitz was immensely meaningful, of course, as were the many local ceremonies. But perhaps we should focus our energies instead on Yom Hashoah, the Israeli springtime commemoration, which remains – shock horror – solely about the Jewish genocide. Perhaps it is time to defend our right to mourn.

    It's Holocaust Memorial Day. Not Genocide Memorial Day. The clue's in the name.

  • Keeping generations trapped in a cycle of war

    built.

    Oh, and by the way, while Hamas turned Gaza into a death trap, using babies, women, and even foreign workers as human shields, did anyone notice that Israel fought to free Thai farmworkers who were kidnapped?

    The schools in Gaza which brainwash children into believing war is their destiny, and martyrdom while killing Jews their sole aim in life, are run by UNRWA – an organisation dedicated to the belief that Palestinians will always be refugees until Israel is destroyed. And we fund it.

  • Money for UNRWA

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    As has been said here often enough, UNRWA are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

  • Turning the tide on an indefensible cult

    not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures,” reads the executive order, entitled Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.

    This means no more puberty blockers, no more operations, double mastectomies, castration, “facial feminisations” and all the rest of it. No more irreversible “gender affirming care”.

    The Democrats, still apparently stunned into stupor, appear to have no understanding of how this issue affected their loss in November’s election, and continue to defend the indefensible. All of this will now be fought out in court cases and arguments over Medicaid and insurance.

    How did we get to this? How did anyone think that telling children that they were born in the wrong body, and that those bodies could be surgically and chemically rearranged was sensible? But this is hardly the first time medics have caused harm.

    There's a grim history of medical fads, like lobotomies, that now seem barbaric. Others, for instance the refrigerator mother theory of autism, fitted in with psychological theories of the time but have long since been discarded. Somehow gender theory combined the two: barbaric in its treatment of supposed "trans kids", and faddish in its embrace of postmodern queer theory and the like. But gender theory has had a far wider effect than any of its predecessors. It's been embraced from the top, by governments on down. And the damage it's done has been, commensurately, much deeper.

    For in the end, gender ideology is a belief system, a cult, a religion. It is entirely faith-based. Science and reality do not figure. Yet as this belief system starts to crumble, how do those who believed in it walk it back?

    They believed above all that they were the good people, that sex was a spectrum, not a binary. They believed that legitimising the fetishistic behaviour of middle-aged men was the new civil rights movement. That this group had little in common with ever-increasing numbers of deeply unhappy teenage girls who did not want to grow into adult women was obvious. Except to the cultist.

    Trans became an umbrella with its own language, and the righteous and the modern took it to be the one true faith. Stonewall spread this ideology. So did the BBC, The Guardian, most liberal media, the Labour Party, the Fawcett Society, the NHS, the “humanists”, the entire art world, and academia – in other words, the cultural elite….

    Few will admit they were wrong or misled. They will simply rewrite history. Just like those who sought to relieve the agonies of deeply depressed patients through an ice pick in their brains, they will say their experimental treatments did help some, that they were at the forefront of a new kind of medicine.

    Those who cheered this on will keep quiet while they scrabble in the dirt for the next civil rights battle. They picked the wrong one. It would take actual bravery to say this in public. Their silence is deafening.

  • Mississippi 1902

    William Henry Jackson: the Mississippi River ca. 1902. "St. Paul from High Bridge."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/William Henry Jackson, Detroit Photographic Company]

  • Back to the ERCC

    cannot give women reassurance that they will be able to access single-sex spaces at these centres.

    “Ultimately, the SNP’s reckless self-ID policies are to blame for this betrayal of women and girls.”

    Meanwhile, life goes on:

    The Sunday Post reported at the weekend that in an internal consultation document about new rules, RCS stated that a woman can be “anyone who self-identifies as a woman”.

  • “It kind of made me hate football”

    he same month she turned 18. It was alleged she said: “Ref, have you checked if all of their players are eligible to play? Look at their ’keeper and for example their number 10 is obviously a man,” or something similar.

    She was banned for six matches, two of which were suspended, after accepting the charge brought under national Football Association rules that allow those born male to play in women’s matches. The teen was also forced to undergo an “online education course”, while her club were handed seven disciplinary points.

    An investigation into her comments required her to provide a written statement, which Telegraph Sport has been told she needed assistance in composing. In it she said she had sought guidance from the referee due to her trans opponents’ “extremely aggressive” style of play. She also said she had not taken her ADHD medication on the day in question because “another medical condition” had prevented her from doing so.

    The disciplinary proceedings were triggered by a complaint made by the opposition club, which included the claim that she had said to their non-trans players: “This is a man.” She has admitted trying to ask those players if their team-mates were biologically male after failing to get clarity from the ref, who, she wrote in her statement, had threatened to send her off if she continued to quiz him on the matter.

    Speaking to Telegraph Sport on condition of anonymity, the teenager said of her ban: “It kind of made me hate football.”

    Yes, it kind of made me hate football too. Well, the FA at least. 

    She also said she feared she had been gagged from asking questions or raising concerns about playing against those born male. “If I say anything else, I get another six-game ban,” she said. “So I can’t even stand up for myself at this point.”

  • Settler Colonialism revisited

    I posted about Settler Colonialism here back in November, having just read Adam Kirsch's On Settler Colonialism. Now here's Helen Dale, who's also just read Kirsch's book. She has a specifically Australian take.

    Many of the world’s worst ideas come from the United States. Critical race theory and affirmative action, for example, are all-American. Even when bad ideas lack American origins, US academics manage to execute hostile takeovers of (say) French nonsense like postmodernism or queer theory early on in proceedings. This is then exported in over-simplified form to the rest of the world, to other countries’ considerable detriment. Even the American political system—which works well enough for Americans in their own country—tends not to travel. US-style presidential regimes are “one of this country’s most dangerous exports,” in Aaron Sorkin’s memorable West Wing phrase, “responsible for wreaking havoc in over thirty countries.”

    However, other countries can also wreak ideological havoc, even quite small countries. It’s worse, I suspect, when those small countries have a reputation for peace and prosperity and order and competence in areas other than academic scholarship. Australia is one such country. And Australia is responsible for about half—perhaps more—of the settler-colonial theory now exploding metaphorically all over US university campuses and literally all over Israel, Gaza, and Lebanon.

    It's worth reading in full. Her conclusion:

    Everyone on earth is living on “stolen” land. Move on.

  • Peace with Lebanon, not just a ceasefire

    Einat Wilf again:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Now the malign influence of Tehran/Hezbollah has gone, why not?

    The situation with Hamas looks intractable: there seems to be no way that Gaza can be rid of them, simply because there's no alternative. There's no civil society to replace them. The destruction of Hezbollah, on the other hand, might well turn out to be the most significant positive effect of Israel's military campaigns since October 7th.