Interview with a recovering academic

Written by

in

biological sex mattered to sexual orientation, and that she felt immune to the “bewitching” power of gender nonconformity. But her background in philosophy played a role too. “I didn’t believe in the power of words utterly to change reality,” she says.

Universities were once bastions of free speech — how did they become places of censorship and moral cowardice? “Some disciplines in the humanities and social sciences became extremely ideological in the 1970s,” Stock replies. “When I was trying to raise the alarm about this to philosophers, I was stuck between the ideologues attacking me, and a bunch of others who thought, ‘Why are you wasting your time with this when it’s clearly stupid?’ But I could see it would have massive implications if we didn’t stop it.”

Stock emphasises this is not unique to Sussex: “I think there’s contempt in universities for ordinary people’s attitudes … on race, immigration or feminism.”

But she also sees signs this is improving on campuses, with academics setting up groups to promote free speech. The other side of the gender debate has “gone to ground”, she adds, a shift she attributes in part to the work of grassroots campaigners — Fair Play for Women, Sex Matters and Transgender Trend. 

Let's hope she's right. But Sussex University vice chancellor Sasha Roseneil is going all out to fight the OfS fine, so the message hasn't reached her yet. And no doubt she'll be receiving a lot of support from more of those brave academics.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *