Intellectuals

Written by

in

Butterflies and Wheels link to Prospect’s list of the top 100 British intellectuals, from which you can vote – ooooh! – for your favourite five.

There’s something deeply depressing about this. It’s that whole idea of an intellectual. One thing I particularly like about British culture is something that’s often taken as its major weakness: its dislike of intellectuals. Through most of the 20th century, intellectuals were almost invariably Marxists or Freudians or both. More recently they’ve been followers of Derrida or Lacan or Althusser or some such modern master. Intellectuals, basically, don’t have a clue. Much of the history of the 20th century is the history of intellectuals getting it wrong. A nation of shopkeepers, traders, money-grubbers, as opposed to those who devote their lives to higher things like the, um, French? Fine by me. We’ve managed to produce some fairly decent culture on our way as we scrabbled to make ourselves rich.

So what do we need intellectuals for? I understand what journalists or philosophers or playwrights do, but what do intellectuals do? Attract acolytes? Formulate Casaubon-style theories-of-everything? Appear on TV to tell us how to live our lives, or what to think on issues of the day? Um, no thanks; I’d rather listen to my newsagent on the subject of, say, Iraq; especially as he wouldn’t be speaking from the assumption that he was my moral and intellectual superior. And that whole telling truth to power thing – it’s self-indulgent, it’s offensive, it’s dated. We no longer – if we ever did – need smart educated people to stand up for us poor stupid proles. We can think for ourselves.

I’m not particularly concerned about the list itself. It’s not like I’m outraged that X or Y are missing. There are some individuals on there whose work I’ve enjoyed or profited from, some who I’ve never agreed with at all, some who I think are massively over-rated, and some I’ve never heard of (Adair Turner?). I imagine most people would have the same reaction. So what? Good luck to them. But our top 100 intellectuals? What a load of self-indulgent media-bollocks.

Comments

  1. Dave Avatar

    I think you’re over-analyzing it a bit too much. Sure, there are going to be some rather useless ivory-tower academics on the list, but in general, intellectuals contribute a great deal to our culture and society.
    Think of them as inventors of ideas, providing conceptual advances rather than technological. Like inventors, most of them are looking for the next great thing in toilet paper, but a few are going to be the next Einstein or Darwin or even Freud (as much as we’ve discredited him, he did completely revolutionize his field).

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Dave – I’ve no argument with the idea that people who invent ideas etc. contribute enormously to our culture. It’s that term “intellectual” I have a problem with. Neither Einstein or Darwin were what I would call intellectuals: they were scientists.

  3. Dave Avatar

    If you’re going to make that distinction, then I suppose there are only a small fraction of intellectuals that contribute meaningfully.
    The problem in the intellectual community as I see it is a sort of academic inbreeding, where someone comes up with a nifty idea, and everyone else beats it to death, or applies it where it shouldn’t be applied. See: post-colonial theory, Orientalism, etc.

  4. Backword Dave Avatar

    g about the very very very fine details, and Darwin was ignorant of Mendel), but you’re only as good as your last goal. These polls are fun, as self-revealing… they’re crap for telling us anything about society.
    Rereading Dave’s first comment, I’m struck by the problem of “public intellectuals.” Richard Feynman said that if his work could be explained to the press, it wouldn’t be worth the Nobel, and Alistair Cooke noted that he once tried to produce a program about the double helix, only to realise how difficult it was. Way beyond a TV audience.

  5. Laban Tall Avatar

    Adair Turner was a businessman and sometime CBI chief. I wonder if Peter Bauer made it ?
    Of course I presume Billy Bragg is there …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *