The Islamic Blanket

Written by

in

Speaker] Arinc are trampling the constitution with their statements, and are committing a crime.”

CHP Chairman Deniz Baykal underlined that Erdogan’s interpretation was against the principle of secularism and the constitution that secures this principle, and added that Erdogan’s words reflected a longing for a theocratic state.

Baykal further said: “These words should not have come out of the mouth of a prime minister of the democratic, secular Turkish Republic. That we should ask the ulema! What kind of mentality is that? What else should we ask the ulema? Should we consult them on having four wives [as permitted by Islam]? About the inheritance law? Maybe on women’s rights? And who shall we ask? The Shi’ite ulema in Iran? Or the Wahhabi ulema of Saudi Arabia?”

Not forgetting, of course, novelist Orhan Pamuk’s trial, for “insulting Turkishness”, due to start in Istanbul tomorrow:

The charges relate to a magazine interview in which Orhan Pamuk said 30,000 Kurds and one million Ottoman Armenians were killed in Turkey and no-one dares talk about it.

He could face up to three years in jail.

Comments

  1. Juan Golblado Avatar
    Juan Golblado

    I hope the Turkish armed forces remain strong and that the US and other Nato armed forces have remained in close touch with them.

  2. Juan Golblado Avatar
    Juan Golblado

    It looks like the EU is making the right sounds. Here’s Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn on the court case of Orhan Pamuk:
    “It is not Orhan Pamuk who will stand trial tomorrow, but Turkey. This is a litmus test whether Turkey is seriously committed to the freedom of expression and reforms that enhance the rule of law and benefit all Turkish citizens. I expect Turkey to respect the European Convention of Human Rights and the Copenhagen political criteria of the European Union. This is an opportunity to set a positive precedent for the numerous other cases on free speech that are awaiting trial. Considering the number of recent prosecutions, it appears that the new Penal Code does not provide sufficient protection for the freedom of expression…”
    http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEX/05/1215

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *